<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James Hopkins &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jhop.me/tag/seo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jhop.me</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SEO-related TV marketing observation</title>
		<link>http://jhop.me/general-stuff/seo-related-tv-marketing-observation</link>
		<comments>http://jhop.me/general-stuff/seo-related-tv-marketing-observation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hopkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idreamincode.co.uk/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I&#8217;ve been noticing quite a few company TV adverts that don&#8217;t include their domain name; instead displaying &#8216;Search [keyword]&#8216; at the end of the ad to get their target audience to look on their site. To me, this strategy seems fairly risky; the majority of these adverts are time-limited and unless the SEOers involved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I&#8217;ve been noticing quite a few company TV adverts that don&#8217;t include their domain name; instead displaying &#8216;Search [keyword]&#8216; at the end of the ad to get their target audience to look on their site. To me, this strategy seems fairly risky; the majority of these adverts are time-limited and unless the SEOers involved have built up some good quality backlinks to the site (using relevant keywords in anchor text, and such), it&#8217;s going to be difficult for that site to get to the top spot &#8211; I would suggest that even second spot in the SEs for their most competitive keyword would count as a fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jhop.me/general-stuff/seo-related-tv-marketing-observation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

