<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James Hopkins &#187; Webkit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jhop.me/tag/webkit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jhop.me</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:49:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Today I nearly broke down in tears (with annoyance)&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://jhop.me/browsers/today-i-nearly-broke-down-in-tears-in-annoyance</link>
		<comments>http://jhop.me/browsers/today-i-nearly-broke-down-in-tears-in-annoyance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hopkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acid3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webkit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idreamincode.co.uk/general-stuff/today-i-nearly-broke-down-in-tears-in-annoyance</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past week has provided us with some interesting news.
First off, there&#8217;s been a hype of activity from both Webkit and Opera &#8211; Webkit&#8217;s blog kept us informed that it&#8217;s Acid3 DOM test score was increasing, it seemed every day, which ultimately led to it announcing on Wednesday that it had released a public build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past week has provided us with some interesting news.</p>
<p>First off, there&#8217;s been a hype of activity from both Webkit and Opera &#8211; Webkit&#8217;s blog kept us informed that it&#8217;s Acid3 DOM test score was increasing, it seemed every day, which ultimately led to it announcing on Wednesday that it had released a public build of a successful Acid3 rendering pass (but not an animation pass). This announcement came very soon (on the same day, in fact) after <a href="http://www.css3.info/opera-overtakes-safari-in-acid3-race/">David announced that Opera&#8217;s latest internal build had passed all 100 DOM tests</a>- it was just very unfortunate that some people misinterpreted this information and started accusing the Opera team of <a href="http://www.css3.info/opera-overtakes-safari-in-acid3-race/#comment-125101">pulling stunts</a> and <a href="http://www.css3.info/opera-overtakes-safari-in-acid3-race/#comment-125060">deliberately trying to mislead</a> &#8211; a sad state of affairs, especially because it came a result of this great news.</p>
<p>However this is not why I felt tearful.</p>
<p>MS decided to publish an <a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc351024(VS.85).aspx">article</a> which details planned CSS support in the final release of IE8, which put a complete dampener on the day that I read it.</p>
<p>As I thought right from the start of talk of it&#8217;s release, CSS3 support is <strong>extremely</strong> disappointing, which is guaranteed to slow the adoption of features of CSS3. Well done Dean and the rest of the IE team- you&#8217;ve come up with yet another inferior browser.</p>
<p>which is guaranteed to slow the adoption of the fundamental layout-specific features of CSS3.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written a basic overview of the article. It mentions:-</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>NO</strong> planned support for CSS3 pseudo classes</li>
<li><strong>NO</strong> planned support for CSS3 pseudo elements</li>
<li><strong>NO</strong> planned support for CSS3 features in Backgrounds and Borders module (no multiple backgrounds, background-size etc)</li>
<li><strong>NO</strong> planned support for CSS3 features in Color module (no RGBA, opacity etc)</li>
<li><strong>SOME</strong> support for Level 3 of Text module</li>
<li><strong>MINOR</strong> support for Basic UI module. Hardly surprising as the module currently has no owner, and there is no test suite Nice though to see that they&#8217;ve implemented box-sizing even though it&#8217;s with their own prefix.</li>
<li><strong>NO</strong> support for Multi-Column module.</li>
<li><strong>NO</strong> Media Query support</li>
</ul>
<p>Before the announcement went public, I took it as a given that IE would HAVE to pass Acid2; looking back, it would have been simply astonishing if it hadn&#8217;t. But, now vendors are focusing on Acid3, which makes its predecessor completely redundant- with this in mind, there was absolutely no reason why the IE8 Acid2 pass story should have been as big as it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jhop.me/browsers/today-i-nearly-broke-down-in-tears-in-annoyance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
