<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet more innovation from the Webkit guys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jhop.me/browsers/yet-more-innovation-from-the-webkit-guys/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jhop.me/browsers/yet-more-innovation-from-the-webkit-guys</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:47:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Robinson</title>
		<link>http://jhop.me/browsers/yet-more-innovation-from-the-webkit-guys/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idreamincode.co.uk/general-stuff/yet-more-innovation-from-the-webkit-guys#comment-39</guid>
		<description>&gt; Dropping the “-webkit-” from “box-sizing” actually broke real-world Web sites

That sounds, well, plain bizarre. Which sites?

Sites using &quot;box-sizing&quot; already? Or just plain old legacy sites?

If it&#039;s the latter, wtf?  If it&#039;s the former, then either the sites or Webkit is wrong. No?

Dave, could you shine some more light on this, please? I&#039;m sure the explanation is not bogus, but it doesn&#039;t really help anybody else understand when Webkit might be able to drop the prefix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Dropping the “-webkit-” from “box-sizing” actually broke real-world Web sites</p>
<p>That sounds, well, plain bizarre. Which sites?</p>
<p>Sites using &#8220;box-sizing&#8221; already? Or just plain old legacy sites?</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s the latter, wtf?  If it&#8217;s the former, then either the sites or Webkit is wrong. No?</p>
<p>Dave, could you shine some more light on this, please? I&#8217;m sure the explanation is not bogus, but it doesn&#8217;t really help anybody else understand when Webkit might be able to drop the prefix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hyatt</title>
		<link>http://jhop.me/browsers/yet-more-innovation-from-the-webkit-guys/comment-page-1#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idreamincode.co.uk/general-stuff/yet-more-innovation-from-the-webkit-guys#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Dropping the &quot;-webkit-&quot; from &quot;box-sizing&quot; actually broke real-world Web sites, so we had to keep the prefix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dropping the &#8220;-webkit-&#8221; from &#8220;box-sizing&#8221; actually broke real-world Web sites, so we had to keep the prefix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
