<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: Compatibility View Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jhop.me/general-stuff/re-compatibility-view-stuff/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jhop.me/general-stuff/re-compatibility-view-stuff</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:47:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Thomas</title>
		<link>http://jhop.me/general-stuff/re-compatibility-view-stuff/comment-page-1#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idreamincode.co.uk/?p=260#comment-123</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree with your mention of the issue regarding IE condition comment operators and they&#039;re impact when combined with IE8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree with your mention of the issue regarding IE condition comment operators and they&#8217;re impact when combined with IE8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tenno Seremel</title>
		<link>http://jhop.me/general-stuff/re-compatibility-view-stuff/comment-page-1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tenno Seremel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idreamincode.co.uk/?p=260#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Well, angry developers are err... angry ? Who isn&#039;t though… In particular I don&#039;t understand unwillingness to support XHTML in IE after all this years. It&#039;s not that they don&#039;t have an XML parser anyway…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, angry developers are err&#8230; angry ? Who isn&#8217;t though… In particular I don&#8217;t understand unwillingness to support XHTML in IE after all this years. It&#8217;s not that they don&#8217;t have an XML parser anyway…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
